USITC makes third anti-dumping decision on refined brown aluminum oxide from China
2020-02-10 16:59:29 [Print]
On February 4, 2020, the United States International Trade Commission (USITC) voted to made the final industrial injury affirmative determination of the third anti-dumping sunset review on refined brown aluminum oxide imported from China: if the current anti-dumping measures were cancelled, the substantial injury caused to the domestic industry of the United States by the import of the products involved in the case could continue or recur within a reasonably foreseeable period
On November 20, 2002, the United States filed an anti-dumping investigation on the refined brown aluminum oxide originated from China. On September 26, 2003, the U . S . Department of Commerce made an anti-dumping positive final judgment on the refined brown aluminum oxide imported from China . On October 1, 2008, the U . S . Department of Commerce conducted the first anti-dumping sunset review investigation on the refined brown aluminum oxide originated from China . On January 23, 2009, the U . S . Department of Commerce issued a notice to make the first anti-dumping sunset review final judgment on refined brown aluminum oxide originating in China . On February 3, 2014, the U . S . Department of Commerce conducted the second anti-dumping sunset review investigation on refined brown aluminum oxide originating in China . On September 18, 2014, the U . S . Department of Commerce issued a notice to make the second anti-dumping sunset review final judgment on industrial damage of refined brown aluminum oxide originating in China . On September 10, 2019, the U . S . Department of Commerce issued a notice to launch the third anti-dumping sunset review investigation on the refined brown aluminum oxide imported from China . On December 31, 2019, the U . S . Department of Commerce announced that it will make the third anti-dumping fast sunset review final judgment on the refined brown aluminum oxide imported from China.
. According to the final result, the current anti-dumping measures in this case remain effective . In the ruling, five members of the U . S . International Trade Commission voted yes.On November 20, 2002, the United States filed an anti-dumping investigation on the refined brown aluminum oxide originated from China. On September 26, 2003, the U . S . Department of Commerce made an anti-dumping positive final judgment on the refined brown aluminum oxide imported from China . On October 1, 2008, the U . S . Department of Commerce conducted the first anti-dumping sunset review investigation on the refined brown aluminum oxide originated from China . On January 23, 2009, the U . S . Department of Commerce issued a notice to make the first anti-dumping sunset review final judgment on refined brown aluminum oxide originating in China . On February 3, 2014, the U . S . Department of Commerce conducted the second anti-dumping sunset review investigation on refined brown aluminum oxide originating in China . On September 18, 2014, the U . S . Department of Commerce issued a notice to make the second anti-dumping sunset review final judgment on industrial damage of refined brown aluminum oxide originating in China . On September 10, 2019, the U . S . Department of Commerce issued a notice to launch the third anti-dumping sunset review investigation on the refined brown aluminum oxide imported from China . On December 31, 2019, the U . S . Department of Commerce announced that it will make the third anti-dumping fast sunset review final judgment on the refined brown aluminum oxide imported from China.